Sealed Mindset has their flyer posted. Take a look. Those are some good looking guns.
Sealed Mindset has their flyer posted. Take a look. Those are some good looking guns.
I had a message about getting a Springfield 1911 ready for duty use. The fellow was concerned about having to replace parts, which is a common misconception. You only have to replace a part if it breaks, and you don’t know if a part is going to. Preemptive replacing of all the small bits when there is no reason to is wasteful. A Springfield is a great gun for the basis of a solid duty gun. The gun is pretty dang good out of the box and I wouldn’t say that it needed much. But it does need some work.
First, if the gun has it, I’d get rid of the full length guide rod and put in a regular short GI type guide rod and spring cap. The FLGR adds in more friction, more spots for binding and more friction while it unnecessarily complicates things for no tangible benefit. Get rid of it.
The rails need to be smoothed out. Frame and Slide. These need to be polished. You can do this yourself with some polishing compound and some elbow grease. Under the slide, where the hammer drags across it… that needs to be polished as well. Don’t get too carried away, just make sure it’s smooth. Sometimes this area isn’t and that’s adding drag where you don’t want it. I’ve seen some 1911’s where you could pull the slide back a bit and the hammer would allow the slide to stick there. Let’s take that sticky spot away.
I’d replace the factory Springs with a Wolff spring that’s 2 pounds heavier. Duty ammo is a touch hotter, so that extra grunt is going to help buffer slide battering, but more importantly the extra push in the slide is going to help chamber a round that might not otherwise want to feed all the way in. The most common jam in my pistol classes with 1911’s when they get hot and dirty is a failure to feed. Usually the slide stops about a quarter inch short of home and a tap with the palm of the hand to the back of the slide usually does the trick. A spring that is a little stronger reduces that type of jam. Some guys think that they have to ream out the chamber and throat… when really all they need is a smoother action and a stronger spring. Now, sometimes you do need to have a chamber and throat job. But most of the time, you don’t. And most of the time those guys that think they do are running Handloads and blame the gun. Sure “Factory” runs fine, but with your absolutely flawless handloads – must be something wrong with the gun… they made the chamber too tight. Uh huh.
Run Factory Ammunition.
Lubrication is critical. This is why Crusader made Slipstream Weapon Lubricant. Clean your 1911 with MPRO-7 Cleaner completely. Get some Slipstream and soak that 1911 in it… apply it generously to all the moving parts and friction bearing surfaces and work that in. Cycle it by hand a hundred times. Then strip it, do it again. Now, get out to the range and go shoot it. A lot. Then clean it and Slipstream it again. The Nano Lube that makes Slipstream black… those particles… will get into the metal, imbed in the surface and will seriously slick that gun up. This is beyond what your favorite oil can do. I’ve a Springer GI – nothing fancy. But it’s slicker than a Nighthawk Custom and it’s never jammed on me… Since I Slipstreamed it. 500 rounds in a single day? No problem. No failures.
Smooth, Simple, Slick, and Strong… that’s what the 1911 needs to run flawlessly.
That and Factory ammo. Speaking off ammo. We all know the 1911 was designed to run Ball Ammo. Modern Hollowpoints sometimes don’t run in 1911 without a little work. Typically those rounds being 230 grains. I’ve seen many times, and once even in my own Springfield… where a 230 grain JHP round failed to feed. But the same load using a 185 grain ran flawlessly. These were Hydrashocks in my gun, but I’ve seen the same thing with others JHP’s. Going down to 200 or 185’s generally let finicky 1911’s run perfectly. I happen to prefer Medium to Light bullets for caliber in handguns. In my experience most guns seem to shoot better than using that rather than heavy for caliber loads, such as 230’s in .45 or 180’s for .40. But that’s just me.
Damn it, Man. I don’t need a new 1911 .45. No, I don’t. Why do I need another one?
At SHOT Show took a look at the brand new and shiny Kimber Solo 9mm. At for some reason that I can’t put my finger on… I disliked it. No, let me be clear. I hated it. I wouldn’t have one. Even if it was gifted to me, I’d sell to some unfortunate nitwit who would think it was nifty and then I’d go buy something I liked more and could get more use out of… like blister cream or 8 Track tapes.
And now here it is, six months later. To be honest, it’s grown on me. I no longer hate it. For some reason I can’t put my finger on… I kinda like it, and I wouldn’t mind having it. But I’d still never actually buy it.
It’s… hmm… I’m searching for the right word for it… “Nice”. It’s a nice little gun. And perhaps that’s its problem from the start. You see, a universally accepted good gun like a 1911 Commander .45 is great looking gun… beautiful, in the eyes of fellows like me. At the same time it feels just gorgeous in the hand. It fits. It also looks like what a Weapon should look like… it looks like it’s going to destroy something, it just hasn’t decided who yet. It has a form that’s based on it’s function and that function is to put large bullets through bad guys.
And this is where the Kimber Solo Nine Millimeter fails. Even in the name, just say the name a few times out loud… it even just sounds “Nice”. Like something Julie Andrews might have in her purse… it’s just well mannered and nice. Or like something you might spread on a piece of toast. It’s nice… Pleasant, without being fun or too interesting. Like having a Brunch with your Grandmother… nice… And that’s what put me off of the Solo. It is completely lacking in Sex and Violence.
Now, if Kimber was to scale the Solo up… to say .45… then all the sudden it would become very interesting. Or even something slightly different, like .357 SIG. But just a 9mm? Sure, it works… perfectly serviceable. Certainly better than a .380… it’s nice. But I won’t buy Nice. Not for the price. The thing is retailing for about $630 and for that much salad you have a world of other options that are less “nice” with more Sex and Violence.
Can you imagine the Solo in .357 SIG? Kind of like a young Julie Andrews playing a lead role in a remake of Bound. Proper, but she’s a dirty dirty girl behind closed doors.
Alternatives would be perhaps a Kahr MK9, or if you can find one, a Colt Pocket 9 – which I am still wanting one day. A Springfield EMP9 would also be pretty cool. But the Solo 9? It just leaves me feeling less than satisfied.
I think I just might be the first gun writer that has compared a handgun to the star of Sound of Music… Well, at least not to Captain Von Trapp.
I think I want another AR, build by Crusader Weaponry of course… but I think I’m going to do something a little different.
Being a Gun Counter guy at the best stocked gun counter in the western states, I see a lot of AR-15 builds in a lot of different configurations and normally I’ve just glossed over them, and everything in all the catalogs. But there is one that I keep coming back to… it’s not one we’ve stocked… but the idea of it is sticking in my head like a naughty idea. I keep looking at the Bushmaster MOE Dissipator. What I like about it is the longer sight radius for when using irons… and the longer gas tube, which does come good things for the gun’s longevity. Mostly a slightly lower cyclic rate which reduces wear and tear slightly. What a great looking gun… and it fits the way I shoot. I like that. A lot. I think I need a Crusader build along those lines.
Also along these lines, I’m about ready to just sell my Surefire Quad Rails and the Surefire Weapons Light, Mount, tape switch and everything. Hell, I’m about ready to just trade someone straight across for an MOE handguard with 2 rail section and a MX3 light. Weight. I’m tired of the weight. As much as I love my M4’s accuracy, I’m sick of lugging that thing. It is a heavy beast. Of course I have the heavy barrel as well, which isn’t helping, but at least I could trim some mass off my primary weapon… couldn’t hurt. (BTW, this wasn’t a Crusader Build)
Retired Navy Seal, Larry Yatch, is one of the most impressive men I’ve ever met. Great guy. He has started a very impressive training school called Sealed Mindset. We talked at SHOT Show together with Joe Chetwood about building a rifle for a friend of his. Evidently the gun was a success. We now build their guns built to their specs.
Guys, these are probably the most hard core AR-15’s we’ve ever built. No, strike that – they are the most hard core AR-15’s we’ve ever built. And these guns are exclusive to Sealed Mindset. We can’t sell them to you. If you want one, contact Sealed Mindset, and order one. While you are there, sign up for a training class to go with it.
For more photos of these awesome guns, check them out here.
Please stop making “Ribber Grips”. No one likes them.
Thanks,
Ogre
I talk about this with customers and knowledge seekers all the time. Caliber is a question that really doesn’t make such a huge difference as most cartridges are throwing the lead in a similar trajectory until you get into some extreme differences. So your old .30-06 vs .270 question is moot. Most guys get the bigger caliber and then shoot the cheapest bullets through it. This is not advisable. Your bullet selection plays an important, critical part. Because the rifle doesn’t make the kill. The bullet does. You need to match the bullet to what you want to kill with it.
For some reason, this segment of the shooting community has exploded. Because evidently classic .22 shooting just isn’t cool enough anymore. You have guns like the Ruger 10/22, the Marlin Model 60, the Marlin 39A Lever Action, or something simple like one of the excellent CZ bolt actions…. but no… they are not “TACTICAL”. Let me tell you, the Lever Action was Tactical before the word was invented. Because if “Black with Rails” means Tactical then I guess it’s not. If Tactical means it can be applied with tactics, or if it’s user friendly and provides actual utility in different situations, then absolutely. Well, some folks think it’s all about the AmTracks… so we have to roll with as many rails as possible to be even more tactical. I mean, hell, we have Rails for our Rails because no one is making a gun with enough rails so we have to add more. Anyways, the rifles. Let’s take a quick look.