Category Archives: Weapons
Dear Ruger
Hi, its me again.
Look, I know we don’t see eye to eye on a lot of things… But I’m trying to like your Gunsight Scout rifle. Can you do me a little favor?
Can you make it take FAL or M-14 mags? Either one. Thanks. Yeah, because your proprietary 10 round mag kinda sucks. A lot.
And while you are at that… Make a semi auto .22 Mag pistol with a crazy high capacity. Based on your SR9 should be great.
Cheers!
Must Have Upgrades to your AR
Everyone is now getting into the AR Platform. Either in the .308 size, which we can call the Heavy, and the AR-15’s classic .223/5.56mm size, which we will just call it an “AR”. We’ve seen people from all walks of life coming in and buying their first AR type rifle. They’ll come in and look at all the variety and it can be bewildering. Really when you ask the guy at a well stocked gun counter to look at an AR, that’s like saying you want to look at a “Truck”. It really doesn’t help the guy – or you – out at all. Tell him what kind of an AR you want. “Varminting”. “Tactical”. “Basic”. Give the guy something to work with. He wants to help you get what you want. It can be frustrating and a huge waste of time if he hands you a dozen different AR’s and you say no to everything because your wasting his time letting him show you Tactical configurations when you are wanting a Varminting type rifle. I’ve heard at another gun store the clerk getting fed up and saying “Why don’t you come back when you know what you want?” That’s a failure from both parties if that happens. You are the customer, you have the money, you have the control here… so try to guide that clerk and help him. Most Gun Counters are staffed with guys that either don’t know any more than you do about guns and are just Helpful Sales Staff, or they are dedicated Gunnies that don’t have those Sales Skills. Very few Gun Stores are staffed with Guys that know how to help a customer and know their way around Firearms.
So you get that cool AR that you want. What do you need with it? We can start at the front or back, where do you want to go first? Front? Okay… At the Muzzle, most AR’s are coming with a standard Flash Hider. This is a device that defuses the muzzle flash and reduces the light that is emitted when you shoot at night. This is a good thing on a military gun. Not all that helpful on most AR’s though. But it looks “MilSpec”. Many milspec looking flash hiders will help reduce muzzle climb a bit, but mostly they just make the gun louder and “Look Cool”. There are a lot of different options out there, but I like to go with a Compensator or Muzzle Brake type device. This is going to redirect the muzzle blast in such a way as to pull the rifle forward for the net result that you feel less recoil. This is going help you keep your sights on target. On a tactical gun, where you are buzzing off multiple shots, it helps you keep all those rounds in the kill zone. On a Varminter, it lets you keep your target in your scope so you can see your hit, even at long range or if your scope is at high magnification. Either style gun you go with, this is a good thing.
For this, I suggest a BATTLECOMP unit. They are compact, light, simple, and is designed by a NASA Engineer. You know those guys… they used Rocket Powered Sky Cranes to lower a Robot down to the surface of Mars. What more pedigree do you need when it comes to expertise in Vectored Thrust?
Moving back into the action, the heart of the rifle is BCG. The Bolt Carrier Group. Really it isn’t so much who’s BCG you use, but how you treat it. The very best thing you can use for your BCG, is SLIPSTREAM. Here is a very long thread about Slipstream with lots of people’s impressions after using it. You can order it from Amazon.com, and if you throw in a couple UPRISING books, then you’ll even get that Free Shipping. There you go. What makes Slipstream an Essential addition to the gun is that it makes that BCG so slick, that it increases reliability in all conditions. Especially in extreme conditions such as with heat and dirt. You can use it just like a regular oil, and use it generously. The more you use it, eventually the less you’ll need as the nano particles will embed and become permanent.
Under the BCG is the trigger mechanism, again, Slipstream, but under that is the pistol grip. Most AR’s are coming with the standard A2 Pistol Grip. This grip is one of the very worst ever conceived by man. Or in this case, conceived by a very effeminate she-man with tiny girly hands that drinks while holding a pinky up. This grip should not be on any AR of any type, no matter what. Ever. The grip is a more personal thing here. I can’t tell you specifically which one to get. But get one. Magpul has two out, the MOE and the MIAD. And now there is a rubber coated MOE version as well, so I guess three. Get the MIAD if you are going to bother. You can set it up to fit you best. There is also the ERGO grip, which I like. And the Hogue grip, which is also a very good grip. Other companies out there are making grips, and there are some good ones. Tapco, Mako, US Palm, Tango Down, etc… pic one and get rid of that crappy A2 grip.
Up on top of the gun, you need sights. Depending on your configuration, you may need a set of Iron Sights for the front and rear. If that’s the case, the set to get is from Diamondhead. If you are going to run just irons on a gun that doesn’t come with them, these really are the only option. But a set of Diamondheads even as a back up is absolutely the way to go. Don’t think that if you are going to use Irons as a backup to your Optic, that you can cheap out on them. If you are in a situation where you really need your Back Up Sights – you probably are going to want some accuracy with them as this is probably a very critical situation. Don’t cheap out here and get the cheap Magpul flip ups… Popular and Good are too different things. Don’t make me mention Lady Gaga. Yes, I just said that the Magpul flip up sights are the Lady Gaga of rifle sights. We don’t like plastic sights on our Glocks, why would we actually want them on our Rifles? MapPuls are good because they are cheap and light, and that’s it. They are place holders until you get your Diamondheads. The Diamonheads are excellent because they actually let you be more precise with your Sight Alignment. This means better accuracy. Tighter groups. And I think they even help you get that sight picture a little faster than standard Peep Sights.
Red Dot or Magnified Optic? For a simple low cost Red Dot, there is only one option worth spending your money on. Lucid HD7. You can pick them up for 200 bucks, and it’s money very well spent. If you can’t afford the Lucid, don’t buy something cheaper to hold you over… just save your money and run Iron Sights for awhile. That will get you your Lucid quicker. If you want something higher end, there are the optics from EOTech and Aimpoint. Which ever one you like the best is fine. The Military uses both for a reason. Tough and Reliable. Going up from that, there is Trijicon. They have the SRS which I am quite fond of. Up from this, we can look at the magnified optics, and again, Trijicon is the Cat’s Meow. Higher end than that, and you have Elcan, which we at Crusader Weaponry put on our Broadsword rifle for Demo purposes.
Then there are the 1-4 variables. Burris makes a few good ones. They make some half decent fixed 3 or 5 power units, but I really like their 1-4’s… but the one to get is Trijicon if you can splurge for it. Really, which optic to pick really comes down to what kind of shooting your are doing, your eyes, and your style. This is a more personal option here.
The stock. There is nothing wrong with the standard A2 or M4 style stocks. But the Magpul MOE and CTR stocks are becoming very common now days. And adjustable stock can be a good thing, but too many guys are stroking their buffer tubes like a 14 year old boy with a playboy. Don’t do that. Set it to a length that fits you and leave it the hell alone until you have a reason to adjust it. It’s not a toy. It’s a freaking Rifle Stock. If you are spending time playing with your stock, you are wasting time that could be better spent, I don’t know… reloading magazines or sharpening your Becker BK9 Combat Bowie knife.
Some stocks have storage compartments. These should only be for 1 thing. Batteries for your Optic. Don’t keep anything else in there. Everything else can be kept in your pack or vest or LBE, glove box, wherever. But not on your gun. I’m not even sure I like storage at all on my AR’s anymore.
My choice for a stock? Just a basic Magpul MOE stock is good. It looks sharp, it’s light, and it’s simple.
What do you guys think are Essentials for an AR.
Half way through Beretta Month.
Let’s see… We’re at the half way point.
What are my impressions?
I’m well pleased with the Beretta. The Size and Weight, I was expecting to become a problem. The gun is heavier than anything else I’ve carried these last few years and it does pull my belt down on one side a bit. But then again, I’ve also lost a lot of poundage and the belt is looser than it as ever been. I prefer to use Pancake style OWB holsters for comfort, and this probably helps a great deal. But do to the overall size of the Beretta, I have found that it can print depending on what I am wearing… namely a loose fitting Under Armor Polo if I lean forward or bend down to pick something up. Other than that, the gun stays well hidden and doesn’t cause any problems. The length of the barrel, being that full length fighting gun, does mean that the holster can at times Peakaboo out from under a jacket or shirt tail or sweater. But since this is fall, if I’m not working, I favor nice baggy hoodies anyways so this is no problem.
I still love the Full Size feel and the confidence this gun radiates. The accuracy is great and I can hit very well with it. I’ve changed the thick rubber grips off of it for OEM polymer grips, which may seem like a downgrade, but they fit my hand so much better, so it’s a plus for me. I am liking the Beretta more and more as time goes on. I am not ready to give up on my Glocks any time soon… but the Beretta is indeed going to be a regular gun in the carry rotation from now on. I intend to use this in more active roles now. I should have used it at the MAG-40 class, where I am confident that I could have scored my 300 instead of the 298.
The downsides to the 92FS as a Daily Carry Gun. A. It’s size. It IS just a very large handgun and if this was the peak of summer, packing it concealed would be more of a problem as I can’t wear Hoodies. Packing it Open Carry, like I can do around here easily, does attract a few eyeballs, but no one has said anything. It’s more overt than my smaller, less interesting Glocks. B. I wish the 92FS’s used a Dovetailed front sight post. While this pistol does have Night Sights, being a former LEO weapon, I would have loved the chance to tap in a different front sight post, such as a Mepro or a Big Dot.
So to sum this up, I’m giving it an 8 out of 10 at this point.
Dear Mossberg
Please stop what you are doing. Just stop it.
Your Lever Action SPX. Stop it.
Your huge Breacher muzzle devices. Stop it.
All of your Bolt Action Rifles. Just stop it.
Your Road Blocker and Chainsaws… STOP!
You have become the BUDK Catalog of the Firearms Industry. I now CRINGE every time one of your boxes shows up… I’m afraid to open it and look in for fear of what fresh new hell you decided to unleash.
I can’t take anything that says Mossberg on it seriously anymore. Your 930 and 590 series guns are awesome, but even then. It’s like telling a young person that I loved the STARSHIP TROOPERS book because the Movie is so fucking retarded. A lot of newer shooters don’t know what a 590 is, and instead smirk at the Mossberg name. “Hey, the 590 is a great gun!” I come off sounding like a Nutter. This is what you have done to yourselves, Mossberg.
This is why there is no more EXTREME SHOCK ammo… No matter their ammo was actually great, their company Image had become such a joke, they couldn’t be taken seriously anymore and they had to shut down and completely restructure to regain some traction.
This is what you need to do, Mossberg.
You are trying to market to the same guys that want COUNTER SNIPER OPTICS, Big Low Pressure Petroleum Fireball Explosions, and “STACKED AND PACKED” Calendars. You want Video Game Players. Your Target Audience is CALL OF DUTY. STOP THAT!
Have some Self Respect, Mossberg! If I go to SHOT and see something like a CHAINSAW LEVER – I’m going to fucking slap the shit out of you.
Seriously Fugly
The Springfield XD pistols. Just horrid looking. Oh, they are indeed good guns… but the are hard to look at. The M’s are better looking, but not by a huge amount. Like the West Virginian Cousin of an Okie.
Springfield really needs to just drop the XD line and lower the price of the XDM’s. The M is all around the better pistol in every caliber and size.
Some quiet fun.
Critical Duty vs PDX1. Fight!
I’m a big fan of both. Hornady ammunition is solid, reliable, and accurate. Their Critical Defense line of ammo is very good. Very clever. Putting a rubber plug in the cavity of a hollowpoint to insure expansion without the need for they hydrostatic pressure to force expansion. Brilliant. And the Critical Duty like is a tougher bullet, loaded hotter. I’m impressed with the 135 grain 9mm CD load so much so that I may adopt it for use here at Ogre Ranch and for my personal carry gun (this month being the Beretta 92FS) and for the carry load for my Son’s pistol, an M&P.
But is the new Critical Duty better for serious use than the Winchester PDX1 loads? Winchester did a great deal of engineering to get these loads just right, and they built off the long years of experience for making the most effective duty loads you could get for the last 20 years. I am an unabashed PDX1 fan. I was a fan of the Black Talons and the Ranger T loads. In fact, I still have Black Talons standing by. The PDX1 takes that reverse tapered jacket approach and now gives us the Bonding improvement that made loads such as the Gold Dots so popular.
I’m not sure… but I am thinking that I will keep the PDX1’s for all my guns, save for the 9mm’s and roll with Critical Duty loads for those. Actual testing will have to be done though before I make any changes.
No Glock November
It started as a challenge. A gauntlet thrown. No Glocks for the Month of November, just Beretta, and specifically, just the Beretta 92FS, which I just happen to have. I can’t give the details, or any better explanation… but I have my reasons.
I came into the Beretta 92FS which was owned by my Brother, which was owned by my Friend, which was owned by evidently a Cop according to Beretta. But all that is not important. The important bit is the challenge its self. The fact that the Beretta is “Too Big” and “Too Heavy” and it has the Safety in the wrong place and it’s just wrong to Carry and that you can’t do it. Well, yeah, I can, and I am. In fact, it’s mostly Open Carried when not at work, which is no big thing out here in my part of the world. Lots of guys Open Carry around here. And since the Election, the numbers of Open Carry that I’ve seen has gone through the roof.
Back to the Beretta. I got it well used. Thanks to another friend at Beretta, I’ve changed the locking block, springs, and the grips back to OEM. This required the grinding of the Grip Screws as they were too long and locked the magazine in tight like it was bolted in… because it was. So I had to shorten them. This took all of 4 Minutes. The thicker rubber grips were just a touch too thick for my hands. With the OEM’s back on, I like it much better. Fits my hand and points better for me. I am digging the gun. It’s a good 92, and according to Beretta it’s a Law Enforcement gun that came from the factory with Night Sights.
So now that everything is ready for duty, I’m going to pack nothing but this Beretta for the rest of the month. No 23’s, no 22’s, no 17’s… Not even an M&P, and no 1911’s. Just Beretta, and just this 92FS.
All carry and all pistol shooting is Beretta. This is going to be a challenge because I am so used to the Glocks. My G23 in my Adams Holsters Sharkhide rig has been a part of me. I am no stranger to the 92. I had one before, years ago. I sold it and got a CZ-97B, and that turned into another gun that I don’t remember… Springfield maybe. Yeah, that’s what it was. But I had a nice 92 that I had picked up almost brand new. To be honest… as much as I liked it… I wasn’t that good with it. Well, I’m a much better handgunner now, so I’m not bothered with going from crisp single action like triggers to this DA/SA style.
Another challenge was thrown and accepted. Next month, it’s SIG.
Remington Buys TAPCO
Just read that Remington has acquired TAPCO. That’s interesting. Because as much as Remington has turned MARLIN into a major SNAFU, they have been doing very well the Tactical stuff. Bushmaster and DPMS – for all their flaws – has been made better by Big Green. AAC, the guys that make some serious use Suppressors has had some more attention as well. Remington is putting a huge amount of effort into the Tactical Category. I find this very interesting. And now TAPCO. Well, if anything, Remington can’t screw up TAPCO, makers of cheap crap to hang off your AR. Sure, some of it isn’t bad I guess, functional, and does what it is supposed to do.
I still find the MARLIN, H&R, New England Arms purchase to be most curious. Remington wanted to get into the Lever Action business and has just about completely ruined Marlin because of it. But then again, Marlin was on a downhill slope to begin with. But I still find it funny that Remington is still having Marlin make their Savage Clones, and New England is still importing their Chinese made 870 knock-offs. I don’t get this. Did Remington really need to get into the Cheap Gun market? Or did they need to get into the Lever Market?
I tell you what though, Remington needs to get back into the Hunting market. That’s what built Big Green into Big Green. The Tactical Market has far too many competitors and Remington is gambling big time on the possibility of future Military Contracts. And while they are concentrating on Fighting Guns, the Hunting Gun market is slipping out of their grasp.
If I was going to buy a hunting rifle right now – whatever caliber – I’d be looking at Sako A7’s, Tikka, or Browning. The T3’s have come a long way and are consistently impressive with their accuracy. Browning rifles have never disappointed, in fact, their X-Bolt rifles are a top choice. I’ve not seen one that looked like it was the last rifle slapped together on a Friday evening. I’ve not seen one that couldn’t shoot. They are building them right.
Back to TAPCO. Why would Remington need to buy TAPCO? I would have thought Remington would have rather swallowed up MAGPUL, considering that they are already using a lot of MAGPUL stuff in their BushyPanthers. The MOE line is almost as universal as “A2” Furniture. Are they going to stop using MAGPUL now and go TAPCO Intrafuse? That would be a mistake, but if they own the brand, they are going to want to pimp it as much as possible. And I’ll be honest, I’d rather not have anything TAPCO on any of my AR’s.
So why TAPCO?
What does TAPCO do in the Tactical Market that no one else is really doing? AR SWAG? No… Shotgun shit? Cheap ass stocks for your Mini-14 and SKS? No. You know what comes to my mind when I first think of TAPCO?
AK-47’s. They are the Go To Guys for your AK parts. Their stocks are industry standards, and if you want a Trigger then you have to get the TAPCO G3 trigger. The only company really doing anything else for your Kalish is US PALM, but they are small potatoes compared to TAPCO’s market penetration into the AK sector.
Does this mean that REMINGTON might get into the AK business? Well, yeah, they just did. But are we going to see an R-47 rifle? Hmmm…