Colt needs to step up.

11029477_10206344155336155_5105444812896027913_n

COLT.  One of the most famous names in the firearms industry.  And one of the most poorly managed companies, with some of the most lack luster products for some of the highest dollars.   Colt is one of the least impressive companies still in business.  They think their name still holds currency in the market, and for a small, dwindling market segment, they do.  But that base is shrinking.  Colt may be coming out of bankrupcy again – but if they don’t change, they are going to go right back into it.

Any Colt firearm only looks good if you don’t look at any of the competition’s products.

From these images it looks like Colt is making some fine weapons.
And really, they are.  But there’s a problem.  They are over priced.  Somewhere about 200 dollars over priced.  At the same time they are not up to snuff, compared to the competition.

11855735_10206344272619087_6838740654867145340_n

Let’s look at the Mustang.  The competition is the SIG 238 and the Kimber Micro.  All three of these pistols are subcompact .380 Autos, all similar design and function.  And all taken from the original Colt Mustang, that Colt killed, SIG resurrected, and then Kimber and Colt came on with the Me Too theme.

11855748_10206344155456158_3414958049244882086_n

Of the three, the Colt is the most expensive, and as you can see, the least desirable.  It’s the worst finished, with the worst sights.

11863486_10206344272979096_2765592659748474450_n

The other Colt guns leave me a bit unimpressed.  The slides are alright, but the frames all feel like they are unfinished sand-castings. Of course, they are not… they are Media Blast finished… but they feel… sandy.    Rough.  Sets my teeth on edge like fingernails on a chalkboard.

11880455_10206344154576136_7471875301209925883_n

SIG’s 238 set the bar for what this sort of pistol needs to be like.  And Kimber took that challenge and came in with a tie score.

11888072_10206344272459083_7745045408872495375_n

The Kimber – being not a favorite brand of mine by any means… has a strong game in the Micro.   Making the Colt look like the Ugly Step Sister… which it is.

11902529_10206344272019072_7093522347484724687_n

Other than the finish, the Colt’s molded in front sight is just flat out unacceptable.  The others have dove-tails with high viz sights.  The Colt’s is No-Viz.

11923248_10206344272739090_6664855761592085744_n

You can see, of the Three Amigo’s, the Colt is one no one wants.  It’s clearly the worst of the three, and yet carries the higher price tag for no reason.   (The Kimber in the photo is wearing the Crimson Trace Grips, which makes it more expensive than the standard Micro.)

11951107_10206449242323264_8389511706863381915_n

Here’s the Cold Railed pistol.  A Tactical pistol with an all the bells and whistles price take, but has no bells and no whistles.  It’s pretty much at the same level as a Springfield Loaded Model, being simply a railed 1911… but has a premium price tag only because it bears the Colt name.   Rough finished frame, notchy feeling action, and a trigger that feels like you are dragging a piano over a gravel road.  This is not a good gun for the money.

11960064_10206449242363265_6388149816880200062_n

If you get one, you are going to need to an action job, trigger job, new sights, and you are going to want to get that frame cerakoted or something.  So about 500 dollars worth to put this gun where it needs to be.

11988307_10206449242283263_7532056819955394412_n

While I do like the look of it in the photos I took… yes, it looks nice.  It just doesn’t feel anywhere near as good as it looks.   Honestly, for less money, you could buy a Springfield MC Operator or a SIG 1911 TacOps, and have a better gun right out of the box, and save enough money for some spare mags and a case of ammunition.

What does Colt need to do to fix these?   Well, finish them for one thing.  Everyone else is throwing on some checkering or a nicer finish, and coming in at less cost.  Let’s start with that.  If Colt can step up to that level… That would be nice.  A move in the right direction.

We don’t even need to talk about the Reliability issues.   The Defender model of 1911 is one of their most popular models.  It’s also the most unreliable 1911 I’ve ever seen next to any Kimber Ultra pistol.  I saw one guy that had bought two of them.  Both of them didn’t work.  Both went back to the factory.  Once returned, one of them still had the reliability of a 4 year old.   And the one that “Worked” had the most sporadic ejection I’ve ever seen on any gun.  It was more like an open pan of popcorn… it could spit cases out in any direction.  Including into my forehead and teeth.  Some directions seemed physically impossible.    And that’s just the guns from one customer.  One man.  There have been others.  Many others.   In fact, of all the Colt Defenders I’ve seen sold or have sold myself.  Well, I don’t know of any that didn’t cause the owner some sort of grief.   I do know a couple guys that have them and say they have no problem with them.  But these guys don’t actually fire the guns.  If you don’t actually shoot it – of course it’s not going to cause you any problems.  Problems are only going to pop up when you pop rounds.  So these guys are saying that the guns don’t spontaneously self destruct, I guess.   Grips don’t suddenly spring off the gun and fly across the room… No problems then.

I’ve never seen a reliable Colt Defender.  Ever.  I’ve never seen a reliable Kimber Ultra either, but you can get an Ultra for a lot cheaper than a Defender, and any of the Ultra series guns are probably better guns than the Defender.  Maybe even more reliable.  Maybe.

If Colt is going to really make a come back with the American Gun Owner – Colt is really going to have to step up.

8 thoughts on “Colt needs to step up.”

  1. Colt is similar to what Apple has become. At one time, you bought them for reliability and good solid construction. Now, you are paying for the name.
    I have a ~15 year old Rock Island Armory 1911. Other than replacing the recoil spring because it has worn out, I’ve had no issues. I’ve known plenty of people with Colts that payed more than twice what I paid for my pistol, and they’ve had plenty of issues with their pistols.
    Like you said, Colt appears to be badly run and just doesn’t really seem to care.

  2. I’d say that the first thing that Colt needs to do is leave Massachusetts for a tax-friendly and gun-friendly state further south, where labor is cheaper and people don’t view guns as something to be ashamed of or classed with other “vices” such as pornography or cigarettes.

  3. I once bought 3 pretty used-up, A2 type, police trade colt AR’s on the cheap. Between the three I made 2 good ones but the one I used the worst of the parts on had a shot-out barrel.
    When I went looking for a factory barrel I learned that Colt stuff is indeed overpriced by an order of magnitude.

  4. What can you say about an iconic pistol company, that doesn’t even have e a .22 LR in the line-up? After making world-beaters like the Woodman, and the Python? Are there even any gunnies in the management anymore? So sad…..

  5. A couple of guys I work with recently bought Colt 1911’s (model with plastic mainspring housing). They say they’re happy with them but these dudes will NEVER run those pistols hard.

  6. Your correct in your assessment, I have owned a few Colts in my time, a SP1 AR15, tits up the best AR to fire 55 grain
    Bullets. The Colts Government Model series 70 with few custom mods, and 2.5 Diamondback in .38 Spl.
    Colt withe Government contractshould essentially said screw the civilian market, now they have to compete in a new market…
    They need to lower prices, bring back quality firearms, and update designs…how bout an ambidextrous safety on a Woodsman Target Match? ANY INTEREST?

Leave a Reply to JohninMd.(Help!?!!) Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *