Thank You SAVAGE ARMS

Back on 10-09-08 I wrote the following:

“An Open Letter to All Gun Manufacturers: We are sick of the .22 Hornet. Not all of us are reloaders, and commercial .22 Hornet ammunition is expensive. Stop shoving the .22 Hornet down our throats. Yes, its a nifty cartridge, and a lot of fun – and back in the day we all had wonderfully full and colorful summers with Pa’s Hornet carbine and a pocket full of shells. But these days, at $45.00 a box, no one is shooting it a lot unless they are reloading it. In the same guns you are chambering for .22 Hornet, you could be chambering them for 5.7x28mm. This gives you the same happy fun joy, using premium ballistic tipped bullets, for the same price a box as cheap .223 FMJ loads. This means we shooters can enjoy your product a lot more, for a lot less… which means we will be buying more of your product chambered for these instead of your .22 Hornet versions. Magnum Research’s BFR in .22 Hornet would sell more if it was in 5.7x28mm. The CZ 527 in .22 Hornet would be more enjoyable in 5.7x28mm. Anything you are chambering a Hornet for, or a Fireball round for… do it in 5.7x28mm instead. Please. It’s just about the most dandy of cartridges out there that I care to buy myself, and I know a lot of guys out there that feel the same way. Forget the Hornet and embrace the 5.7x28mm. Thank you.”

Some time later I wrote to Savage, and even posted that on MadOgre, that they need to do the Model 25 Lightweight Varminter in 5.7x28mm.

They did it.

Gotta love it.  They took their time doing it, but they beat CZ to the punch.  I told CZ that they needed to do it in their 527, but they decided against it… instead they continue to push the .22 Hornet.  With the cost of ammo going up and the factory production of .22 Hornet going down; I see a lot of Hornets getting retired.  We don’t even stock a rifle in Hornet and haven’t been asked for one in years.

This however – this would sell.  This will sell once people realize what it is they can really have here.  I’m telling you, this is the IDEAL small game or fur bearing hunting kit, right here.   Top that with a little 2-7x32mm or a fixed power… Man.. that would be SWEET.

They also have something else that is also sweet as hell.  (and yes, hell can be very very sweet indeed)

The Model 10 FCM Scout.  In 7.62x39mm.  You guys remember me being quite a fan of the CZ 527 Carbine.  Scope mounting and options for that gun suck. Namely because of the bolt handle hitting the occular bell of most scopes.  That and CZ makes some seriously awful rings and their proprietary bases on the 527 limit your options drastically.  As much as I loved the gun – it had limitations.  Also the bedding wasn’t as ridged as I would have liked.  Overall, the gun was fantastic… within it’s limitations.   Savage gives you a light weight carbine, without those limitations.  I had thought about buying the Scout in .308… but 7.62x39mm… VERY tempting.   I know a lot of guys are going Gaga over the Ruger Scout.  Ruger, meet your Superior.

The only thing Savage is lacking in these Model 10 guns – and this is something Savage could fix so easily – 10 Round Magazines.  I have lost sales on Savage guns because of this.  I have had customers ready to buy – form 4473 in hand – and they walked away because of the magazine limitation.  And these are some of the best guns in the industry.   Go figure.  Savage, make us some 10 round mags!

5 thoughts on “Thank You SAVAGE ARMS”

  1. If Savage wants to sell a ton of Russky Scouts, they need to borrow a page from SIG and configure it to accept AK mags. That would rock.

  2. Savage’s scout scope mounting base is a weak design.
    It is easily bent downward toward the barrel if a scope ring is used in its “diving board” area. Other than that, the gun is an excellent package and handles really well.

  3. Savage Shooters Supply makes a 9 round factory style magazine, but it’s $80. Better off getting a DBM and using Accuracy International mags for that kind of coin.

Leave a Reply to Ogre Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *